Electronics - JVC carmcorder puchrased at Circuit City refusal to honor makers warranty
|
Electronics - JVC carmcorder puchrased at Circuit City refusal to honor makers warranty
Refusal to honor manufacturers warranty JVC From: Date: Friday, June 30, 2000 04:01 PM
Sent To: Email User; Email User 6/30/00 4:01:05 PM
_____________________
Beware if buying a JVC camcorder or dealing with Circuit City. On 12/22/99 we purchased a #CRSXM515U model JVC camcorder from Circuit City. The warranty on this camera was 90 days labor; 1 year mfg warranty. The total cost of camera was $822. The camera was used successfully a total of three times between 12/22/99 and 4/19/00. On 4/23/00 upon attempting to operate the camera, the lens cover would not open. We took the camera to Circuit City on 4/25/00 and paid $30 to send it off for repair. On or about 5/1/00 I was contacted by Circuit City and asked to authorize approximately $100 for repairs. I authorized the $100. The second week of May I was again contacted by Circuit City verifying my authorization and telling me that the camera was being repaired. On May 9, 2000 I received a call from Circuit City requesting authorization for $765 in repairs. I denied this request. I asked them to send my camera back to the store (Huntsville, Alabama). On May 9, 2000 I contacted Circuit City to check on status of camera and was again told it was being repaired. I contacted Circuit City on May 17, 2000 and was told the camera was not being repaired, but had been denied repair by Circuit City and JVC. I asked that a Service Center representative contact me to discuss this situation. I received a call from Kerry Wilson, Nashville Service Center, Technician Manager for Circuit City. He told me that JVC had denied authorization to repair this camera three times. The explanation I received was that the "main board" inside the camera had a piece broke. Mr. Wilson told me he would contact Jessee Richmond (JVC representative) for authorization to send the camera to the Lawrenceville, GA service center to be examined for repair. At this point, I contacted Circuit City Consumer Affairs representative Mike Olek. I believe I was getting the run around. No one wanted to repair the camera. Circuit City would not repair the camera without authorization from JVC and JVC would not authorize supplying the parts for the camera. I have been jerked around since 4/25/00. I was told three times that the camera was being repaired. Finally on June 7, 2000 after the camera was reviewed at JVC in Lawrenceville, GA,I was contacted by Kerry Wilson, Nashville Service Center and told that although the camera was in great condition, and had obviously not been dropped or harmed, JVC had again refused the manufacturers warranty on the camera and it was being sent back to the Huntsville, AL store for pick-up. Upon arrival at the Huntsville store, I discover what I feel is the real reason JVC would not repair my camera. This camera has been discontinued and replaced with a model which costs $425. I am stuck with a camera which does not work and cannot get any relief from JVC or Circuit City. From: Message Author (click here to email author)Date: Saturday, 01-Jul-00 16:01:00 CDT Business: Reply Online Consumer: Comment On This Comment On ThisYou could have avoided all this by buying the extended service plan, you would have received a new camera and saved a major headache. Consumers need to understand that it is not the store's fault that sells the products that they fail or have problems! From: Message Author (click here to email author)Date: Monday, 20-Oct-08 11:12:58 CDT Business: Reply Online Consumer: Comment On This Comment On ThisIt is not Circuit City's fault that JVC did not want to fix the camera. Circuit City JUST SELLS THE STUFF. You are just lucky that they even offer a send off service for you. Otherwise you would have had to contact JVC Directly. Why should Circuit City eat the cost of something that is not their responsibility? From: Message Author (click here to email author)Date: Wednesday, 07-May-08 23:36:52 CDT Business: Reply Online Consumer: Comment On This |
|